Member-only story

War Powers in an Age of Terror: Exploring the Legal Framework for Military Operations

Nathaniel Powell

·2.8k Followers· Follow

Published in Restoring The Balance: War Powers In An Age Of Terror

4 min read · 1 week before

259 View Claps

28 Respond

Save

Listen

War Powers In An Age Of Terror Restoring The Balance: War Powers In An Age Of Terror

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the United States launched a global war on terror. This war has involved military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and many other countries. The legal framework for these operations is complex and has been the subject of much debate.

Restoring the Balance: War Powers in an Age of Terror

by V.N. Datta

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1829 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	181 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

The main legal authority for the use of military force is the War Powers Resolution (WPR). The WPR was passed by Congress in 1973 in response to the Vietnam War. It requires the president to consult with Congress before committing US troops to combat and to withdraw troops within 60 days unless Congress authorizes their continued use.

The WPR has been criticized for being too weak. Critics argue that it gives the president too much power to wage war without congressional approval. In 2001, Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) in response to the 9/11 attacks. The AUMF authorizes the president to use all necessary and appropriate force against those responsible for the attacks.

The AUMF has been criticized for being too broad. Critics argue that it gives the president too much power to wage war against any country that he believes is a threat. In 2013, Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA),which includes a provision that requires the president to report to Congress on the use of military force against terrorist groups.

The legal framework for military operations in the age of terror is complex and evolving. The WPR, the AUMF, and the NDAA are the main legal authorities for the use of military force. However, these laws have been interpreted differently by different presidents and Congresses. As a result, there is no clear consensus on the legal limits of military operations in the age of terror.

The debate over the legal framework for military operations in the age of terror is likely to continue for many years to come. As the war on terror continues, it is important to have a clear understanding of the legal limits of military force.

Restoring the Balance: War Powers in an Age of Terror

by V.N. Datta

5 out of 5