Member-only story

The Russian Doctrine of International Law after the Annexation of Crimea: A Critical Analysis

David Peterson

·10k Followers· Follow

Published in Russian Doctrine Of International Law After The Annexation Of Crimea: Monograph

4 min read · 1 week before

1.4k View Claps

88 Respond

Save

Listen

On March 16, 2014, the Russian Federation annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine. The annexation was widely condemned by the international community, and it has raised serious questions about the future of international law. In this article, we will provide a critical analysis of the Russian Doctrine of International Law after the annexation of Crimea. We will examine the historical and legal context of the annexation, the Russian government's justification for its actions, and the implications of the annexation for the future of international law.

Russian doctrine of international law after the annexation of Crimea: Monograph

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1114 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Print length	:	194 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

Historical and Legal Context

The Crimean Peninsula has a long and complicated history. It was part of the Russian Empire from 1783 to 1954, when it was transferred to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Crimea became part of independent Ukraine. However, Russia has always maintained a strong interest in Crimea, and it has a large naval base in the port city of Sevastopol.

In 2014, following the overthrow of the pro-Russian government of Viktor Yanukovych, Russia annexed Crimea. The annexation was justified by the Russian government on the grounds that it was protecting the rights of the Russian-speaking population of Crimea and that the annexation was in accordance with the results of a referendum held in Crimea on March 16, 2014.

The Russian Government's Justification for Annexation

The Russian government has justified the annexation of Crimea on a number of grounds. First, the government has argued that it was protecting the rights of the Russian-speaking population of Crimea. According to the Russian government, the Russian-speaking population of Crimea was facing discrimination and persecution from the Ukrainian government. Second, the government has argued that the annexation was in accordance with the results of a referendum held in Crimea on March 16, 2014. The referendum, which was held under Russian military occupation, showed that a majority of voters supported annexation by Russia.

Implications for the Future of International Law

The annexation of Crimea has raised serious questions about the future of international law. The annexation was a clear violation of international law, and it has undermined the principle of territorial integrity. The annexation has also set a dangerous precedent for other countries to use force to achieve their political goals.

The annexation of Crimea has also had a negative impact on the relationship between Russia and the West. The annexation has led to a sharp deterioration in relations between Russia and the United States and the European Union. The annexation has also led to a number of economic sanctions being imposed on Russia.

The annexation of Crimea was a serious violation of international law and a major blow to the principle of territorial integrity. The annexation has had a negative impact on the relationship between Russia and the West, and it has raised serious questions about the future of international law.

Russian doctrine of international law after the annexation of Crimea: Monograph

5 out of 5