Member-only story

Saving Free Speech From Itself

Guy Powell

·6.8k Followers· Follow

Published in Kindle Edition

4 min read · 1 week before

1.2k View Claps

95 Respond

Save

Listen

By Erwin Chemerinsky

The First Amendment is the cornerstone of American democracy. It guarantees our right to speak our minds freely, even when our speech is unpopular or offensive. But in recent years, the First Amendment has come under attack from both the left and the right.

Saving Free Speech...from Itself

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1217 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	374 pages

On the left, some argue that free speech should be limited in Free Download to protect marginalized groups from harm. For example, they may argue that hate speech should be banned because it can lead to violence against minorities. On the right, some argue that free speech should be unlimited, even if it means that people can say things that are offensive or harmful. They believe that the government should not have the power to censor speech, no matter how hateful or dangerous it may be.

Erwin Chemerinsky, a renowned constitutional law expert, argues in his new book, Saving Free Speech From Itself, that both of these views are wrong. He believes that the First Amendment must be protected from both its enemies on the left and the right. He offers a comprehensive plan to protect free speech from its enemies and preserve it for future generations.

Chemerinsky begins by arguing that free speech is essential for a free and democratic society. He explains that free speech allows us to exchange ideas, challenge authority, and hold our government accountable. It also allows us to express ourselves creatively and to share our experiences with others.

However, Chemerinsky also acknowledges that free speech can be harmful. He notes that hate speech can lead to violence, and that false speech can damage reputations and businesses. He also recognizes that some speech, such as child pornography, is so harmful that it must be banned.

The challenge, according to Chemerinsky, is to find a way to protect free speech while also minimizing its harms. He believes that the best way to do this is to adopt a "balancing test." This test requires courts to weigh the value of the speech against the potential harm that it may cause. If the value of the speech outweighs the potential harm, then it should be protected.

Chemerinsky applies his balancing test to a number of controversial speech issues, including hate speech, false speech, and child pornography. He argues that hate speech should not be banned, even though it can be harmful, because its value in promoting free and open debate outweighs its potential to cause violence. He also argues that false speech should not be banned, even though it can damage reputations and businesses, because its value in promoting the free exchange of ideas outweighs its potential to cause harm.

However, Chemerinsky does believe that child pornography should be banned because its value is outweighed by its potential to harm children. He also argues that the government should have the power to regulate speech in certain limited circumstances, such as when it is necessary to protect national security or public safety.

Chemerinsky's book is a timely and important contribution to the debate over free speech. He offers a thoughtful and balanced approach to protecting free speech while also minimizing its harms. His book is essential reading for anyone who cares about the First Amendment.

Saving Free Speech...from Itself

5 out of 5